Abstract:
In large-data applications, it is desirable to design algorithms with a high degree of parallelization. In the context of submodular optimization, adaptive complexity has become a widely-used measure of an algorithm’s “sequentiality”. Algorithms in the adaptive model proceed in rounds, and can issue polynomially many queries to a function f in each round. The queries in each round must be independent, produced by a computation that depends only on query results obtained in previous rounds. In this work, we examine two fundamental variants of submodular maximization in the adaptive complexity model: cardinality-constrained monotone maximization, and unconstrained non-mono-tone maximization. Our main result is that an r-round algorithm for cardinality-constrained monotone maximization cannot achieve an approximation factor better than 1 − 1/e − Ω(min 1/r, log2 n/r3 ), for any r < nc (where c>0 is some constant). This is the first result showing that the number of rounds must blow up polynomially large as we approach the optimal factor of 1−1/e. For the unconstrained non-monotone maximization problem, we show a positive result: For every instance, and every δ>0, either we obtain a (1/2−δ)-approximation in 1 round, or a (1/2+Ω(δ2))-approximation in O(1/δ2) rounds. In particular (and in contrast to the cardinality-constrained case), there cannot be an instance where (i) it is impossible to achieve an approximation factor better than 1/2 regardless of the number of rounds, and (ii) it takes r rounds to achieve a factor of 1/2−O(1/r).
