25/04/2020

Relational, Flexible, Everyday: Learning from Ethics in Dementia Research

James Hodge, Sarah Foley, Rens Brankaert, Gail Kenning, Amanda Lazar, Jennifer Boger, Kellie Morrissey

Keywords: dementia, ethics, emotion, care, lived experience, relational

Abstract: Engaging in participatory research in HCI raises numerous ethical complexities such as consent, researcher relationships, and participant compensation. Doing HCI work in the area of dementia amplifies these issues, and researchers in this area are modelling ethical stances to ensure researcher-participant relationships focus on meaningful engagement and care. This paper presents an insight into the kinds of ethical foci required when doing design research with people living with dementia and their carers. We interviewed 22 HCI researchers with experience working in dementia care contexts. Our qualitative analysis outlines subsequent lessons-learned, such as recognition of the participants, self-care, research impact, and subjectivity in ethical review boards. Furthermore, we found the complexity of navigating both "everyday" and more formal, institutional ethics in dementia research has implications beyond the context of working with people with dementia and outline key considerations for ethical practices in socially orientated HCI research.

The video of this talk cannot be embedded. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIHJa6WCOA
(Link will open in new window)
 0
 0
 0
 0
This is an embedded video. Talk and the respective paper are published at CHI 2020 virtual conference. If you are one of the authors of the paper and want to manage your upload, see the question "My papertalk has been externally embedded..." in the FAQ section.

Comments

Post Comment
no comments yet
code of conduct: tbd Characters remaining: 140

Similar Papers