25/04/2020

‘Lime’, ‘Open Lock’, and ‘Blocked’

Rebecca Jeong, Sonia Chiasson

Keywords: children, risk perception, cybersecurity warnings

Abstract: Cybersecurity warnings are frequently ignored or misinterpreted by even experienced adults. While studies have been conducted to examine warning design for adults, there is little data to establish recommendations for children. We conducted user studies with 22 children (ages 10-12) and with 22 adults. We compare their risk perception of warning design parameters (signal colors, symbols, words) via card sorting and ranking activities followed by interviews. While our findings suggest similarities in how both groups interpret the design parameters (e.g., red, skull, and fatal convey danger), we also uncovered potential concerns with items currently used as security indicators (e.g., both groups had mixed interpretations of the open lock and police officer symbols). Individual risk perception, particularly for children, appears dependent on personal preferences and experience. Our findings suggest implications and future research directions for the design of cybersecurity warnings for children.

The video of this talk cannot be embedded. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IouQ2GNhPYQ
(Link will open in new window)
 0
 0
 0
 0
This is an embedded video. Talk and the respective paper are published at CHI 2020 virtual conference. If you are one of the authors of the paper and want to manage your upload, see the question "My papertalk has been externally embedded..." in the FAQ section.

Comments

Post Comment
no comments yet
code of conduct: tbd Characters remaining: 140

Similar Papers