04/07/2020

History for Visual Dialog: Do we really need it?

Shubham Agarwal, Trung Bui, Joon-Young Lee, Ioannis Konstas, Verena Rieser

Keywords: Visual Dialogue, Visual Dialog, co-attention models, crowdsourcing procedure

Abstract: Visual Dialogue involves "understanding'' the dialogue history (what has been discussed previously) and the current question (what is asked), in addition to grounding information in the image, to accurately generate the correct response. In this paper, we show that co-attention models which explicitly encode dialoh history outperform models that don't, achieving state-of-the-art performance (72 % NDCG on val set). However, we also expose shortcomings of the crowdsourcing dataset collection procedure, by showing that dialogue history is indeed only required for a small amount of the data, and that the current evaluation metric encourages generic replies. To that end, we propose a challenging subset (VisdialConv) of the VisdialVal set and the benchmark NDCG of 63%.

 0
 0
 0
 0
This is an embedded video. Talk and the respective paper are published at ACL 2020 virtual conference. If you are one of the authors of the paper and want to manage your upload, see the question "My papertalk has been externally embedded..." in the FAQ section.

Comments

Post Comment
no comments yet
code of conduct: tbd

Similar Papers