08/12/2020

Exploring Morality in Argumentation

Jonathan Kobbe, Ines Rehbein, Ioana Hulpuș, Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Keywords:

Abstract: Sentiment and stance are two important concepts for the analysis of arguments. We propose to add another perspective to the analysis, namely moral sentiment. We argue that moral values are crucial for ideological debates and can thus add useful information for argument mining. In the paper, we present different models for automatically predicting moral sentiment in debates and evaluate them on a manually annotated testset. We then apply our models to investigate how moral values in arguments relate to argument quality, stance and audience reactions.

The video of this talk cannot be embedded. You can watch it here:
https://underline.io/lecture/6464-exploring-morality-in-argumentation
(Link will open in new window)
 0
 0
 0
 0
This is an embedded video. Talk and the respective paper are published at COLING Workshops 2020 virtual conference. If you are one of the authors of the paper and want to manage your upload, see the question "My papertalk has been externally embedded..." in the FAQ section.

Comments

Post Comment
no comments yet
code of conduct: tbd Characters remaining: 140

Similar Papers