22/06/2020

Strong average-case lower bounds from non-trivial derandomization

Lijie Chen, Hanlin Ren

Keywords: average-case complexity, circuit complexity, derandomization

Abstract: We prove that for all constants a, NQP = NTIME[npolylog(n)] cannot be (1/2 + 2−loga n)-approximated by 2loga n-size ACC0 ∘ THR circuits ( ACC0 circuits with a bottom layer of THR gates). Previously, it was even open whether E NP can be (1/2+1/√n)-approximated by AC0[⊕] circuits. As a straightforward application, we obtain an infinitely often ( NE ∩ coNE)/1-computable pseudorandom generator for poly-size ACC0 circuits with seed length 2logєn, for all є > 0. More generally, we establish a connection showing that, for a typical circuit class C, non-trivial nondeterministic algorithms estimating the acceptance probability of a given S-size C circuit with an additive error 1/S (we call it a CAPP algorithm) imply strong (1/2 + 1/nω(1)) average-case lower bounds for nondeterministic time classes against C circuits. Note that the existence of such (deterministic) algorithms is much weaker than the widely believed conjecture PromiseBPP = PromiseP. We also apply our results to several sub-classes of TC0 circuits. First, we show that for all k, NP cannot be (1/2 + n−k)-approximated by nk-size Sum∘ THR circuits (exact ℝ-linear combination of threshold gates), improving the corresponding worst-case result in [Williams, CCC 2018]. Second, we establish strong average-case lower bounds and build ( NE ∩ coNE)/1-computable PRGs for Sum ∘ PTF circuits, for various regimes of degrees. Third, we show that non-trivial CAPP algorithms for MAJ ∘ MAJ indeed already imply worst-case lower bounds for TC30 ( MAJ ∘ MAJ ∘ MAJ). Since exponential lower bounds for MAJ ∘ MAJ are already known, this suggests TC30 lower bounds are probably within reach. Our new results build on a line of recent works, including [Murray and Williams, STOC 2018], [Chen and Williams, CCC 2019], and [Chen, FOCS 2019]. In particular, it strengthens the corresponding (1/2 + 1/polylog(n))-inapproximability average-case lower bounds in [Chen, FOCS 2019]. The two important technical ingredients are techniques from Cryptography in NC0 [Applebaum et al., SICOMP 2006], and Probabilistic Checkable Proofs of Proximity with NC1-computable proofs.

 0
 0
 0
 0
This is an embedded video. Talk and the respective paper are published at STOC 2020 virtual conference. If you are one of the authors of the paper and want to manage your upload, see the question "My papertalk has been externally embedded..." in the FAQ section.

Comments

Post Comment
no comments yet
code of conduct: tbd

Similar Papers